Friday, February 22, 2008

Campaign goes on

Clinton’s unexpected graciousness could resurrect her White House hopes

by Etse Sikanku

I hate to break it to you but those who looked at yesterday’s debate as Clinton’s valedictory event should be revising their notes.

The CNN event has confirmed Clinton as the mistress of debate.

Put whatever spin you want on it but it’s quite clear Clinton had the edge. I wouldn’t go as far as to say it will change the contours of the democratic race but give her two more of this and the Obama movement will fade into oblivion.

She had her good and not so good times but she also had the best time as well. It wasn’t so much for her ability to speak out of her heart than her introduction of “faith” and “blessing” into her message.

I have been observing this race for some time now and here’s one clue for the tie break: the religious base.

It's no secret that the Democratic Party has had more trouble wooing the more religiously inclined voters than their Republican counterparts. Now whichever of the two contenders taps into this religious avalanche could add a much needed audience to their support base.

Obama could easily have done this. But once again he allowed Clinton to show the way.
I’m not sure if this is a coincidence but I read something very striking from the bible today from Romans 5:3-5


“…we also rejoice in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces
perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not
disappoint us….”

Obama’s life captures all the elements listed above: suffering, perseverance, character and hope. He could have explained to those who accuse his campaign of promising ‘false hope’ that this hope is rooted in suffering, perseverance and character and above all, “hope does not disappoint”. And it wouldn’t just be Obama saying it but the Holy Book.

Projecting himself as the Bible candidate will have seen Barak racing through the final contests with much less ease.

Clinton’s famous last response did more to her campaign than any political strategist could have done.

To his credit Obama expertly won over the audience with his dismissal of Clinton’s allegations of plagiarism and looked far more presidential but it was Clinton who dominated the decider.

Also Obama looked very confident and seemed to have taken control of the debate right from the start but he could not convert his status as the prohibitive nominee into a match winner.

If Clinton wins the Democratic nomination historians will turn back and look to this period of her campaign-just like her moment of ‘tearing up’ before the New Hampshire primary- as her astonishing break.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Barring any serious revelations, Obama will be the Democratic nominee and the Clintons will have no option than to support him. Else everyone will know they were in this for their own good.

Its over for the Clinto hegemony--except of course Chelsea Clinto decides to revive it.

Anonymous said...

The news has it:
"the polls reveal that the television debate hasn't changed much."

Also guys ccording to the survey carried out by Washington Post/Abc, the debate between the two Democrat candidates ended in a draw. In Texas the former First Lady is trailing Barack Obama by just one percent: 48 to 47, while in Ohio the New York senator has a lead of 50 to 43.

Did anyone notice Clinton was very cautious or if you like calculating?

i read the best summary from AGI : "If Obama hasn't won the debate at least he came out unhurt, with Clinton missing opportunities to launch an all-out attack."

Anonymous said...

Clinton had the worst moment of the two and the best moment of the two.

Anonymous said...

Где и если ты упустила момент и не заметила, сколько он стал "задерживаться"? Если в дежурный раз дети заболели, и ты ухаживала ради ними? Тож когда в сотый раз забыла посещать в парикмахерскую? Или если, изнуренная годовым отчетом, отказала ему ночью, понимая, что не права, но и сил заниматься любовью уже не было, сказав дежурную фразу: "Извини, однако у меня болит глава"? Так, где-то ты ошиблась, не доглядела. Однако ведь где-то и он тебя не понял, не вошел в твое положение. [url=http://tutledy.ru/zhenshchina-i-muzhchina.html]женщина и мужчина[/url]